by Isabelle L. Papillon
Seventeen
months after President Michel Martelly became Haiti’s head of
state with Washington’s backing, Haiti is plunged into a
downward spiral of institutional and political crisis. This
crisis traces its roots to Martelly’s illegal publication of
amendments to Haiti’s 1987 Constitution earlier this year and
his illegal appointment of judges to Haiti’s Supreme Court.
Article 289 of the amended 1987
Constitution calls for a Provisional Electoral Council until a
Permanent Electoral Council can be formed, as provided for in
Article 192.
The nine-member Permanent
Electoral Council (CEP) is supposed to have three
representatives designated by each of the Haitian government’s
three branches: executive, judiciary, and parliamentary.
However, it cannot be formed for two reasons. First, there are
only 20 sitting Senators (the terms of 10 expired in May). Due
to opposition in its ranks, the Senate has been unable to
convene two-thirds of its members in a National Assembly to
designate its three parliamentary representatives to a Permanent
Council. Secondly, in August, four of the nine members of the
Superior Council of the Judiciary (CSPJ) disavowed the three
members appointed by their body to the CEP, saying they were
illegally chosen under the leadership of the CSPJ’s president,
Anel Alexis Joseph, who is also head of the Supreme Court. The
Senate passed a resolution demanding President Martelly recall
the three CEP representatives illegally appointed by the CSPJ.
Meanwhile, the CSPJ has
appointed three new representatives to the CEP: Applys Félix,
Léopold Berlanger, and Carole Floréal Duclervil. The CSPJ now
has six representatives on the CEP, which is totally contrary to
the Constitution and has been widely denounced.
Worse still, all of these
officials have been appointed by the CSPJ to the CEP in a
totally irregular manner. The three new CEP members and the
three previous appointees – Yves Benoit Jean-Marie, Salnave
Exantus, Patrick Metellus – are all illegal and illegitimate due
to the irregularities in the appointment of three judges to the
Supreme Court. (Exantus and Jean-Marie declared on Oct. 8 that
they are "immovable under the Constitution" because they have
taken an oath).
This pyramid of illegalities
committed in forming the CEP is why leading senators and many
other scholars, activists, and jurists are calling for the
formation of a Provisional Electoral Council of Consensus.
Senator Steven Benoit and 16
other senators passed a resolution saying that the appointment
of the CSPJ’s six representatives to the CEP is null and void
future and that Anel Alexis Joseph along with Supreme Court
Judges Kesner Michel Thermesi and Frantzi Philémon have been
named to and occupy their posts illegally and irregularly. This
is because neither Thermesi nor Philémon were on the list of
Supreme Court justices nominees which the Senate provided
Martelly (the president must name judges from that list) and
Anel Alexis Joseph was older than 65, after which age new judges
cannot be sworn in. The three illegally seated justices were key
to the CSPJ’s illegal seating of the CEP’s current six members.
The senators are calling for
the six controversial CEP members to step aside to facilitate
the formation of a new Provisional Council and resolution of the
crisis.
Haiti’s human rights
organizations agree. Antonal Mortimé, Secretary General of the
Platform of Haitian Human Rights Organizations (POHDH), called
for the repeal of the Aug. 15 decree illegally appointing six
members to Martelly’s CEP and the formation instead of a
Provisional Electoral Council to organize overdue elections for
Senate seats and municipal governments. Most political parties,
both on the left and the right, favor the formation of a
Provisional Electoral Council, including the Organization of
Struggling People (OPL) and the Lavalas Family.
Despite the bitter and
widespread outcry, President Martelly and his
illegally-appointed Supreme Court head, Anel Alexis Joseph,
continue to thumb their nose at Haiti’s Constitution and
Parliament. Rather than compromise, they appear to seek
provocation. In an Oct. 9, 2012 decree, President Martelly
summoned the Parliament to a special session on Oct. 11 at 2:00
p.m. (just when the President knew his nemesis, Sen. Moïse
Jean-Charles, would be in New York, speaking to UN officials).
Martelly’s proposed legislative agenda was to ask Parliament to
name three representatives to serve on the CEP.
But Sen. Jean William Jeanty,
one of the nine senators strongly opposed to Martelly’s arrogant
and reactionary tactics, denounced the move. "It is
inconceivable" that Martelly would try to summon the Parliament
in an extraordinary session to appoint representatives to the
CEP, Jeanty said. "The controversies in Parliament surrounding
the issue of the so-called permanent CEP have not yet been
resolved." Jeanty questioned whether President Martelly
genuinely wants to hold elections in Haiti.
Meanwhile, two different
postures toward the crisis have emerged among diplomats based in
Haiti. Brazil, for example, refuses to interfere in Haiti’s
internal affairs, while France continues to meddle with
arrogance and impertinence.
"We do not express opinions
about Haiti’s internal affairs, but we do talk to leaders to
encourage them to show flexibility in order not to paralyze the
country," said Brazilian Ambassador, Luiz Machado Costa to the
Haiti Press Network (HPN), an online news agency.
The diplomat, who arrived in Haiti more than six months ago,
remains very cautious. "It is not our style of diplomacy to
comment publicly on the internal affairs of a country," he said,
"because we would not want a foreigner landing in Brazil to tell
us what to do."
However, Costa wants a climate
of peace and compromise between political forces. "Stability is
needed to move the economy and create jobs," he said, also
calling for the strengthening of political parties in Haiti and
civil society’s involvement to prevent crisis situations.
In contrast, Didier Le Bret,
France’s Ambassador to Haiti, called the CSPJ’s appointment of
three more CEP members “an important step” towards resolving the
pre-election crisis. The French ambassador said that he was
confident that this impasse would soon be resolved. As proof, he
said that just a few months ago, people were wondering how Haiti
was going to get out of the crisis of President Martelly’s
alleged dual nationality or the occupation by former Haitian
soldiers of some Haitian government buildings. "Well then," he
said, "all these crises have been resolved."
But Deputy Levaillant
Louis-Jeune disagreed with the ambassador about those crises and
the current one. “The crisis is only getting worse,” he said. He
called on President Martelly to annul the order appointing a
Permanent Electoral Council of six members and to start from
scratch.
In recent anti-Martelly demonstrations, protestors
have carried flyers calling on Le Bret, as well as U.S.
Ambassador to Haiti Pamela White, to be expelled as “persona non
grata” for their meddling in Haitian internal affairs.
Demonstrators also claim that Ambassador Le Bret openly wears a
pink bracelet, a sign of support for President Martelly who is
increasingly denounced and rejected by the Haitian people. |