The UN's Occupation of Haiti:
A Structure of Global Complicity
by Lorenzo Fiorito
The United Nations Security Council has
renewed its military occupation of Haiti for another year.
The body met on Oct. 14, 2014 and talked for 25 minutes
before
renewing the mandate of
the United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH)
for another year.
Most people across the
Americas are unaware that Haiti’s people live today under a
UN military occupation, the only one in the Western
Hemisphere. They are more likely aware of the recent passing
of infamous dictator and president-for-life Jean-Claude
"Baby Doc" Duvalier than of the military force imposed on
sovereign Haitian soil.
Duvalier, Haiti’s dictator
from 1971 to 1986,
died of a heart attack
on Oct. 4, 2014. He was ousted by a popular uprising 28
years ago but retained wealth and cronies until his death.
Although its spokespeople originally talked of an official
state funeral, the neo-Duvalierist regime of President
Michel Martelly backed away from the idea on Oct. 10 after
it became clear that popular indignation, which still runs
deep, would not tolerate such an honor for the dictator.
One week after Baby Doc's
last breath, the
Campaign to End the Occupation of
Haiti (based in Toronto) held an informational
picket to highlight the abusive role played by MINUSTAH to
ensure a compliant and neoliberal Haiti.
MINUSTAH was charged with
keeping order in Haiti following the coup that removed
democratically elected President Jean-Bertrand Aristide in
February 2004. The coup
had its origin in a 2003
meeting just outside of Ottawa with officials from the
United States, Canada, and France plotting a post-Aristide
Haiti.
MINUSTAH’s abuses against
Haitians are legion: sexual assault of minors (for which,
among other cases,
111 Sri Lankan soldiers and three
officers were repatriated in 2007), political
repression directed against rebellious neighborhoods, and
extrajudicial murders. UN soldiers shot at men, women, and
children, killing dozens, during a violent night-time raid
on Jul. 5, 2005. As 41 armored troop carriers penetrated the
coup-resisting slum of Cité Soleil, UN troops fired over
22,000 rounds of ammunition.
Adding insult to injury,
the world’s worst
cholera epidemic –
originating in October 2010 at a MINUSTAH base – has thus
far
killed over 9,200 people and
infected over 750,000. MINUSTAH soldiers bearing
cholera from Nepal allowed their untreated sewage to flow
into the Artibonite River, Haiti’s largest domestic and
agricultural water source.
These infuriating truths
are symptoms of an underlying power imbalance between Haiti
and the world’s neo-colonial powers, principally the U.S.,
France, and Canada. These three nations proposed and
champion the UN force, and MINUSTAH personnel are governed
by extraterritoriality agreements, which make it difficult
to prosecute foreign troops on Haitian soil. The sense of
impunity these troops must feel – carrying a gun, absent any
fear of legal consequence, psychologically molded in the
global crucible of anti-Black racism – creates a culture of
unrestrained disrespect among UN personnel.
Yet even this haphazard
structure of terror serves a political and economic purpose.
A classified diplomatic cable, revealed by Wikileaks, from
U.S. ambassador to Haiti, Janet Sanderson, stated on Oct. 1,
2008 that "a premature departure of MINUSTAH would leave the
[Haitian] government...vulnerable to...resurgent populist
and anti-market economy political forces – reversing gains
of the last two years."
Meanwhile, part of
MINUSTAH's mandate is
“to support the constitutional and political processes; to
assist in organizing, monitoring, and carrying out free and
fair municipal, parliamentary and presidential elections."
However, the Fanmi Lavalas, Haiti’s largest political party,
has been
barred from all elections
since the 2004 coup. Aristide once led the party and remains
its spiritual symbol.
Haiti under Aristide was no
longer content to be the world’s sweatshop, providing cheap
labor to whomever would bring it capital. Haitians wanted to
chart a course away from the neoliberal capitalist economic
and social policy framework that had generated so much mass
suffering during the Duvalierist and neo-Duvalierist
regimes. Aristide was responsive to the people’s demands
because they put him in power. He knew their living
conditions from working and living as a priest in the
capital’s slums during the 1980s.
Sanderson’s cables refer to
another aim of the Aristide government: repayment of the 90
million gold francs (now worth over $22 billion) paid by
Haiti to France between 1825 and 1947 as compensation for
the slave holders’ loss of property in enslaved Afrikans and
land following the Haiti’s 1804 revolution.
Aristide's demand for
restitution of Haiti’s independence ransom infuriated France
and spurred its help in helping to engineer the 2004 coup.
So Aristide was removed,
and MINUSTAH moved in. But the Haitian people are unmasking
the UN's façade of political neutrality. Duvalier may be
dead, but his policies, administrative approach, ministers,
and political descendants are alive and a part of the
Martelly regime. The Duvalier dictatorship
has morphed into an
"elected" Martelly regime protected by international
"stabilization forces."
Haiti’s ruling class, both
foreigners and the local elite, are far removed from Haiti's
social realities. They are untouched by the cholera, sexual
abuse, and gunfire from the occupation troops and the
surrogate Haitian National Police, which are used to keep
down Haiti’s population.
The heirs of those whom CLR
James called the
"Black Jacobins" have
another battle to fight. The responsibility for ending
Haiti’s occupation is not only theirs, but that of
politically engaged people from
each country of the world
– Canada among them – represented in MINUSTAH.
Lorenzo Fiorito is a student and solidarity activist in
Toronto, Canada. This article, in a slightly different
version, was first published by rabble.ca.
|