Since the Feb.
5 agreement reached
between outgoing President Joseph Michel Martelly and
the presidents of the Parliament, Jocelerme Privert
(Senate) and Cholzer Chancy (Chamber of Deputies), there
was no doubt that the interim president would be
Jocelerme Privert.
Both the 1987 Constitution and the “Group of
Eight” (G8) opposition presidential candidates called
for a judge of the Supreme Court (Court de Cassation) to fill the presidential vacuum. So the
Organization of American States (OAS) – Washington’s
“Ministry of Colonial Affairs” – in league with the
outgoing Martelly clique and Haiti’s ruling class, had
to find a formula with a veneer of legality and
compromise. Moreover, they needed an interim president
who could act as a fireman to pacify Haiti’s streets
while at the same time neutralizing Haiti’s formal and
informal opposition groups, particularly the G8.
Since Feb. 7, when Martelly handed the
presidential sash to Privert (then President of the
National Assembly), the theatre in the halls of power is
just to blunt and bluff the revolutionary upsurge that
has been boiling across Haiti and assure a smooth
transfer of from one neo-colonial regime to another. The
majority of parliamentarians came to their seats through
the same violent, fraudulent elections of Aug. 9 and
Oct. 25, 2015 that have sent the masses into the streets
demanding their annulment. So the supposedly democratic
“debate” in this rump Parliament is only to fool the
naive, silence the recalcitrant, and open the door to
haggling for ever-coveted ministerial posts.
What drama they were able to generate with a very
tight first vote in the Parliament! In the Senate,
Privert got 13 votes and Edgar Leblanc Fils, of the
Struggling People’s Organization (OPL), 10. Among the
Deputies, Privert got 45 votes and Leblanc got 46. There
was one blank ballot and not one vote for Déjean
Bélizaire, a former Senate president in 1991 before the
coup d’état against former President Jean-Bertrand
Aristide.
Suddenly and inexplicably, in the second vote of
the 50th Legislature on the night of Feb.
13-14, everything changed in favor of Privert, who
received 77 votes, to Leblanc’s 33 and only 2 for
Bélizaire.
Now, according to the Feb. 6 accord, “the mandate
of the Temporary President lasts up to 120 days from the
date of installation,” which was Feb. 14. “Where
appropriate, the National Assembly [both Parliamentary
houses] will take the appropriate measures.” In other
words, all power has been given to the rump Parliament.
New elections have been projected for Apr. 24,
and a new president’s inauguration for May 14, but that
schedule can only legally be established by an
independent Provisional Electoral Council (CEP). The
fact that Privert’s mandate is for 120 days instead of
90 seems to confirm what everyone suspects: the process
of rebooting Haiti’s elections is going to take longer
than anticipated.
For many Haitians, Privert is seen as close to
Aristide’s Lavalas Family party, because he was Interior
Minister under Aristide’s Prime Minister Yvon Neptune in
the days leading up to the Feb. 29, 2004 coup d’état.
Both Privert and Neptune ended up spending about two
years without trial in the National Penitentiary after
being accused by Haiti’s post-coup government of
directing the supposed “La Scierie Massacre” in St. Marc
in February 2004. The allegations of that massacre have
been discredited by United Nations investigators, among
others.
However, after his release from prison, Privert
became an advisor to former President René Préval and
then a six-year senator for Préval’s party, Lespwa.
Furthermore, Privert began his career as an
official in the tax collection agency (DGI) of dictator
Jean-Claude Duvalier in the 1980s and represented the
Haitian state at a 1992 International Monetary Fund
(IMF) colloquium in Washington, DC on the neo-liberal
reform of Haiti’s economy.
Therefore, it is clearly too hasty to say that
Privert’s will be a “Lavalas government.”
“It is true that Privert is seen as a moderate of
the Lavalas people, and I’m not sure how much of his
relationship is still with Aristide or whether his
relationship is more with Préval,” said Dr. François
Pierre-Louis, a long-time Haitian activist and professor
at CUNY’s Queens College, in an interview with
The Real News.
Pierre-Louis also points out that during his time
as a senator, Privert “worked well with Martelly. Do not
underestimate the relationship Privert may have had with
Martelly, because ... Privert was very helpful in
helping Martelly on a series of domestic agenda issues.”
Indeed, Privert never publicly criticized
President Martelly and even sat next to Martelly and
Haitian Archbishop Chibly Langlois during the signing of
the infamous El Rancho political accord in March 2014.
As a result, Pierre-Louis warns, “we still have
to wait to see if this compromise of Privert being
interim president comes out of a pact between Martelly
and some sector of the Lavalas movement.”
Especially in a de facto regime, the president is
principally a symbolic position, except that he does
choose the prime minister, who wields state power.
Therefore, it is certain that Washington is most
concerned about who the prime minister will be. Some of
the leading contenders are Evans Paul, Martelly’s last
prime minister, Mirlande Manigat, the center-right
presidential candidate who lost to Martelly in 2011, and
Edgar Leblanc Fils, whose party, the OPL, has
historically been fiercely opposed to Aristide and the
Lavalas Family.
The supreme irony in this scenario is that the G8
and the Lavalas Family originally condemned the
OAS-brokered Parliamentary “solution” which trumped the
Constitution and G8's proposal. However, on Feb. 14,
almost all of the opposition parties had delegations at
Privert’s swearing-in ceremony at the National Palace.
The Lavalas Family even sent its presidential candidate
Dr. Maryse Narcisse accompanied by Aristide’s wife,
Mildred Trouillot Aristide. (Former Sen. Moïse
Jean-Charles declared on Feb. 15 that high-ranking
members of his party, Dessalines Children, were at the
ceremony “on their own” and not representing the party.
Dessalines Children is a central, if not the principal,
component of the G8.)
Also in attendance at the ceremony were the
ambassadors of the U.S.-led “Core Group” and the United
Nations occupation force, MINUSTAH. Is it possible for
genuinely anti-occupation pro-democracy pro-sovereignty
opposition figures to applaud the same solution that
imperialist representatives do?
Later on Feb. 15, the G8 put out a statement
saying it “has followed with interest the scandalous
procedure observed by a ‘national assembly’ performed
outside the constitutional framework to achieve the
election of the interim president.”
The rump Parliament’s move, with OAS backing, “is
an attempt to trivialize the victory of Haiti’s people
on Jan. 22, 2016 where the anti-democratic forces were
forced to back down on their plan to complete a flawed
electoral process not respecting the verdict of the
polls. It is a clear desire to swallow the results of
the 2015 elections.
“The G-8 said that the present crisis, far from
being a mere presidential succession crisis, is a deep
crisis that reflects the disadvantaged masses’ refusal
to be excluded from the country's political life.
“The eruption of the masses on the political
scene as a major player reflects their rejection of a
spent system. Any attempt to force the Haitian people to
accept the unacceptable can only be a thorn that might
aggravate the crisis.”
The G8 note was signed only by Samuel Madistin,
the presidential candidate of the Popular Movement of
the Dessalinien Opposition (MOPOD), as was the case for
the G8's transition proposal in late January.
The huge demonstrations which were a constant over the
past three weeks have now died down, which means the
Privert gambit has worked so far. But one should expect
protest will flare again soon as Washington’s game
becomes clear. The nascent revolutionary organizations
emerging from the Haitian masses say they will continue
to organize and prepare for the months of struggle ahead
and are urging the masses to rely on their own strength,
not follow the often opportunist agenda of political
candidates mostly concerned with securing a salary, jobs
for their friends, and a state vehicle.
|